Peer Review Process
Peer Review outlines the process and guidelines by which scholarly journals evaluate the quality, validity, and suitability of submitted articles for publication. It typically includes the following key points:
1. Ethics and Plagiarism
Ensure that your work adheres to ethical research standards.
Avoid plagiarism by properly citing and referencing all external sources.
2. Submission Process
You can access our submission system via “Submit an Article” link provided on our journal/proceeding page.
Create an author account (if you have not registered before).
Follow the submission instructions, uploading your manuscript and any supplementary materials.
Ensure that Article type is selected correctly.
Carefully review your submission for accuracy before finalizing.
3. Peer Review
Your submission will undergo a peer review process. Please be prepared to address any reviewer comments and revisions if necessary.
There are different types of review process:
Single Review Process: Anonymous reviewers but authors' identities are revealed.
Double Blind Process: Identities of both authors and reviewers are anonymous.
Decision Outcomes: Possible decisions, which can be acceptance, rejection, or revision.
Acceptance: Upon acceptance, the article will be advanced for further processing. A formal letter is sent to the authors and other individuals responsible for specific tasks by the Journal manager, Editor-in-Chief, or Managing editor."
Revision: Reviewers may suggest changes based on their evaluations. It is the responsibility of the authors to meticulously review and address valuable feedback. In some cases, reviewers may ask for a second review to confirm the suggested improvements before granting acceptance.
Rejection: There is a high possibility that the article may not be accepted by the reviewers due to various reasons, such as plagiarism, conflicts of interest, out of scope, lack of originality or supporting evidence, wrong/insufficient conclusions.
The journal policy may note that the final decision rests with the journal's editor, even though reviewers provide recommendations.
